Overcoming Baby Duck Syndrome: How Repeated Use Improves Acceptance of Interface Updates
Users often prefer older versions of interfaces due to a cognitive bias known as the baby duck syndrome, where their first experience with an interface becomes the benchmark against which all future updates are judged. However, an experiment conducted by researchers from HSE University produced an encouraging result: simply re-exposing users to the updated interface reduced the bias and improved their overall perception of the new version. The study has been published in Cognitive Processing.
Mobile and computer interfaces have become an integral part of daily life: in 2024, Russians spent an average of eight hours online each day—nearly half of their waking time. During these hours, we rely on programs, applications, and websites to support our communication, work, and entertainment. However, many people resist interface updates, even when they significantly improve usability. Researchers attribute this to the baby duck syndrome—a cognitive bias in which a user's first experience with an interface becomes imprinted as the standard against which all future versions are judged.
Until recently, the baby duck syndrome has primarily been explored in the context of user experience (UX) and interface design. Most insights have come from UX designers and usability experts who shared their observations through blogs and articles. However, there is still limited scientific evidence on the psychological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. Researchers at the HSE Laboratory for Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interface Users conducted two experiments to better understand why users are often reluctant to accept changes to interface design.
In the first experiment, researchers compared users’ perceptions of the old and new versions of the Airbnb app. Participants were asked to complete a series of common tasks: find accommodation using filters, save its details, and set up an account. The second experiment was carried out using a custom-built student portal that featured two versions differing in colour scheme and menu item placement. In both experiments, participants were divided into experimental and control groups: the experimental group interacted with two different versions of the interface, while the control group used the same version twice.
After completing the tasks, participants evaluated the interfaces’ convenience and overall impression using standard scales: the System Usability Scale (SUS)—recently adapted for Russian-speaking users by the laboratory’s researchers—the SUPR-Q, and the semantic differential scale.
Both studies revealed a clear trend: users tend to rate the interface they first interact with more favourably, regardless of its actual features. For example, in the Airbnb experiment, the older version received higher ratings despite improvements in the new version’s functionality. Similarly, with the student portal, users gave more positive feedback about the first version they saw, even though the design differences were minimal.
Ekaterina Kosova
'It is important to note that the baby duck syndrome is driven not only by familiarity from regular use but also by deeper psychological mechanisms: the first interaction with a system creates an emotional anchor that is hard to overcome,' explains Ekaterina Kosova, Junior Research Fellow at the Laboratory for Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interface Users and co-author of the study.
Interestingly, differences in how users perceived the new and old interface versions appeared not only in their conscious evaluations but also in objective measures such as task completion speed and participants’ emotional engagement.
However, the scientists observed that simply increasing the time spent with the new interface led to more positive evaluations. In the control groups, where participants used the same version of the website twice, a slight increase in ratings was observed with repeated use. This suggests that a positive attitude toward an interface can develop even after multiple interactions. Therefore, increasing the frequency and duration of interface use can help mitigate negative impressions caused by updates.
According to the researchers, companies developing digital products can leverage this insight to lessen users’ negative perceptions of new interface versions.
Nadezhda Glebko
'This evidence is important for interface designers and developers, as it sheds light on why users may react negatively to updates. By understanding the baby duck syndrome, companies can create strategies for smoother update rollouts and communicate new features more effectively to help users adapt,' sums up Nadezhda Glebko, Junior Research Fellow at the Laboratory for Cognitive Psychology of Digital Interface Users and co-author of the study.
See also:
Scientists Test Asymmetry Between Matter and Antimatter
An international team, including scientists from HSE University, has collected and analysed data from dozens of experiments on charm mixing—the process in which an unstable charm meson oscillates between its particle and antiparticle states. These oscillations were observed only four times per thousand decays, fully consistent with the predictions of the Standard Model. This indicates that no signs of new physics have yet been detected in these processes, and if unknown particles do exist, they are likely too heavy to be observed with current equipment. The paper has been published in Physical Review D.
HSE Scientists Reveal What Drives Public Trust in Science
Researchers at HSE ISSEK have analysed the level of trust in scientific knowledge in Russian society and the factors shaping attitudes and perceptions. It was found that trust in science depends more on everyday experience, social expectations, and the perceived promises of science than on objective knowledge. The article has been published in Universe of Russia.
Scientists Uncover Why Consumers Are Reluctant to Pay for Sugar-Free Products
Researchers at the HSE Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience have investigated how 'sugar-free' labelling affects consumers’ willingness to pay for such products. It was found that the label has little impact on the products’ appeal due to a trade-off between sweetness and healthiness: on the one hand, the label can deter consumers by implying an inferior taste, while on the other, it signals potential health benefits. The study findings have been published in Frontiers in Nutrition.
HSE Psycholinguists Launch Digital Tool to Spot Dyslexia in Children
Specialists from HSE University's Centre for Language and Brain have introduced LexiMetr, a new digital tool for diagnosing dyslexia in primary school students. This is the first standardised application in Russia that enables fast and reliable assessment of children’s reading skills to identify dyslexia or the risk of developing it. The application is available on the RuStore platform and runs on Android tablets.
Physicists Propose New Mechanism to Enhance Superconductivity with 'Quantum Glue'
A team of researchers, including scientists from HSE MIEM, has demonstrated that defects in a material can enhance, rather than hinder, superconductivity. This occurs through interaction between defective and cleaner regions, which creates a 'quantum glue'—a uniform component that binds distinct superconducting regions into a single network. Calculations confirm that this mechanism could aid in developing superconductors that operate at higher temperatures. The study has been published in Communications Physics.
Neural Network Trained to Predict Crises in Russian Stock Market
Economists from HSE University have developed a neural network model that can predict the onset of a short-term stock market crisis with over 83% accuracy, one day in advance. The model performs well even on complex, imbalanced data and incorporates not only economic indicators but also investor sentiment. The paper by Tamara Teplova, Maksim Fayzulin, and Aleksei Kurkin from the Centre for Financial Research and Data Analytics at the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences has been published in Socio-Economic Planning Sciences.
Larger Groups of Students Use AI More Effectively in Learning
Researchers at the Institute of Education and the Faculty of Economic Sciences at HSE University have studied what factors determine the success of student group projects when they are completed with the help of artificial intelligence (AI). Their findings suggest that, in addition to the knowledge level of the team members, the size of the group also plays a significant role—the larger it is, the more efficient the process becomes. The study was published in Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
New Models for Studying Diseases: From Petri Dishes to Organs-on-a-Chip
Biologists from HSE University, in collaboration with researchers from the Kulakov National Medical Research Centre for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology, have used advanced microfluidic technologies to study preeclampsia—one of the most dangerous pregnancy complications, posing serious risks to the life and health of both mother and child. In a paper published in BioChip Journal, the researchers review modern cellular models—including advanced placenta-on-a-chip technologies—that offer deeper insights into the mechanisms of the disorder and support the development of effective treatments.
Using Two Cryptocurrencies Enhances Volatility Forecasting
Researchers from the HSE Faculty of Economic Sciences have found that Bitcoin price volatility can be effectively predicted using Ethereum, the second-most popular cryptocurrency. Incorporating Ethereum into a predictive model reduces the forecast error to 23%, outperforming neural networks and other complex algorithms. The article has been published in Applied Econometrics.
Administrative Staff Are Crucial to University Efficiency—But Only in Teaching-Oriented Institutions
An international team of researchers, including scholars from HSE University, has analysed how the number of non-academic staff affects a university’s performance. The study found that the outcome depends on the institution’s profile: in research universities, the share of administrative and support staff has no effect on efficiency, whereas in teaching-oriented universities, there is a positive correlation. The findings have been published in Applied Economics.